Wild habitat – people who destroy it are amoral, not evil

It is difficult to estimate the time to extinction of a species or a population. This is partly due to a time lag between degradation of a wild habitat to the point that it no longer supports a species and the actual death of the last member of that species. The species would be doomed to extinction but may be decades away from a total loss. A wild habitat is also quite resilient and would recover if by chance or intent humans lose interest in their exploitation. This may give us a little bit more time to act.

Image of wild cat in forest wild habitat

To be evil is to know right and wrong and to deliberately choose to do wrong, to wilfully cause pain, death and destruction. To be amoral is to be unconcerned as to the rightness or wrongness of things. An amoral person would therefore act in a way that is totally uncaring of consequences. Although this may be called selfish, it actually goes beyond selfishness into the realm of utter indifference. This is a state of being that is devoid of any feelings of guilt or regret. We will get back to this later on.

Some species are very sensitive to elements in their wild habitat such as light and heat or depend on other species that are so sensitive. Slight changes in these elements just wipe them out if they cannot move to find another similar habitat elsewhere. A species that needs to migrate to keep up with the rising temperatures but is trapped in a forest fragment, no matter how large, is not likely to make it. As we tear through a wild habitat with roads, cities, agriculture, pipelines, dams and human infrastructure we not only decimate populations of wildlife and plants but make it all but impossible for the survivors to move across the human barriers.

The biosphere is made up of incalculable interactions, within ecosystems, between the many millions of species and their habitat. The survival of species, including the human species, depends on the constancy of those relationships. All the relationships and interactions need to repeat themselves day after day and year after year. Looking at this in human terms, if we had to get up one morning to find that all food stores had closed or water was no longer coming out of the taps or that we had nowhere to shelter from the sun, we would have a serious existential problem on our hands. We need these things to be constant. We need them to be there every day.  Unsurprisingly animals and other species also need their life support system to be there every day. Our activity on this planet has radically changed so many of the interactions in the biosphere that the planetary ecosystems may already be compromised. They may not continue to give us, and other species, the reliable life supporting system that we all so desperately need day in, day out.

Image of Giraffes and Zebras in their wild habist

The incredibly rich biodiversity we have on Earth is the result of the inbuilt propensity to move, adapt and change coupled with the ‘limited’ ability to disperse. The emphasis here is on the word ‘limited’. Each species had its place of origin and could only disperse by walking, running, slithering, swimming, crawling or casting its seed upon the wind. In pre-human days dispersal was slow and sometimes impeded by rivers, mountain ranges or the oceans. This is the reason why different species evolved in the different parts of the world although the terrain and climate were similar. All this changed when humans started travelling around the world more efficiently. As we moved around the globe, by design or accident, we took with us, over centuries, tens of thousands of species, what we call invasive species. The resulting disruption in the ecosystem that received the new species caused, and continues to cause, substantial biodiversity loss. This is bad news as biodiversity is the reason for most of our cures to illness and is necessary for our mental health and wellbeing. Biodiversity is what makes the Earth so interesting for us, it is what makes life worth living.

There are important lessons for human society in this. Cultural and geographically dispersed diversity within humanity is not only important but essential for our survival. We should not become as one but should learn to respect our differences, keep within our boundaries. We should celebrate and cultivate all things local and all that makes our community different to others. In nature the boundaries that impede the dispersal of a species are hard and unforgiving to the individuals animals that try to cross them. We humans have the ability to easily go where we please. As we invade the territory of other human communities as tourists, as economic or war mongering invaders, as migrants, we neglect to value our own community back home and we reduce human diversity. This is not a value judgement. It is simply a statement of fact.

Image of birds on water wild habtat

The Anthropocene, or age of humans, has undone millions of years of geographic separation. The process of reshuffling the Earth’s flora and fauna from one wild habitat to another wild habitat, began along the routes of human migration. It has now accelerated to such an extent that in a number of places the invasive species outnumber the indigenous ones. In any given twenty four hour period ten thousand species are being moved around the globe in ships’ ballast water alone. In his 2007 research published on the US National Centre for Biotechnology Information journal, Anthony Ricciardi calls this a “mass invasion event”.

The human invasion of the planet started one hundred and twenty thousand years ago when modern humans first migrated out of Africa. Humans arrived in North America thirteen thousand years ago. This gives some idea of the speed of migration at that time as opposed to the speed humanity moves around the planet today. Other species accompanied humans in their travel such as domesticated dogs, rats and pigs just to mention a few. Some species were deliberately introduced such as rabbits in Australia and starlings in the North America.

Conservationists see non-human invasive species as intruders and there are many initiatives to remove them in an effort to protect the native species. In his 1997 book, The Song of the Dodo, David Quammen warns against demonising invasive species when he says that invasive species “are not evil, they are amoral and in the wrong place”. The principal and most pervasive invasive species of all is, without a doubt, people. We are also the deadliest as we leave devastation in our wake. People display all the characteristics of an amoral invasive species. This is an indictment of human values if there ever was one.

Image of turtle swiming in coral wild habitat

Charles Elton, a British biologist, is credited to have initiated the studies on invasive species with his 1958 book ‘The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants’. Elton concludes that the shuffling of species around the globe caused by humans is disrupting ecosystems and the whole Earth system. He states that “It might take a long time before the whole system came into equilibrium” and he issues this warning that comes to us prophetically from sixty years ago “If we look far enough ahead, the eventual state of the biological world will become not more complex, but simpler – and poorer.”

Main source: Book ‘The sixth Extinction – An Unnatural  History’ by Elizabeth Kolbert

Article published in the Sunday Times of Malta, 14th July 2019